featuring a thorough analysis of the bids for the next 7s Rugby World Cup ... which is your pick for host country in 2018?
The IRB announced today that
14 teams have put their hat into the ring to host the 2018 7s Rugby World Cup.
Not surprisingly the U.S. was among the group. U.S.A. Rugby had
previously announced their intention to bid for the event. Among the
rest of the candidates there are some strong contenders with Tier I
nations England, France, New Zealand, Scotland, South Africa, and Wales
all bidding. Non-Tier I but established 7s nations, like Fiji,
Singapore, Hong Kong, and the UAE have also submitted bids. Rounding out
the interested countries are the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain.
So where does the U.S. stack up among the group? Take the jump to read our take.
To make it simple we'll break it up by country and then discuss the United States.
England: Having Twickenham and the surrounding fields will be a
positive (two fields close together are necessary to host the event) but
hosting the 15s World cup in 2015 has to rule them out as a serious
bid. Two major tournaments in five years is too much.
France: Of the Tier I nations France may be the most intriguing.
It's been a long time since France hosted a leg of the IRB Sevens Series
and right now it's unclear how the public would respond. Still, it
would have been over a decade since they host the World Cup.
New Zealand: No question that New Zealand has a passion for 7s
and the Wellington 7s in particular are a highlight every year. However,
there were a lot of questions surrounding the 2011 World Cup regarding
travel for visiting fans and the overall visibility of the tournament in
the rest of the world.
Scotland: Tradition is on Scotland's side as the birthplace of 7s
but it's a question of whether the IRB wants to use the tournament to
explore new markets. Scotland is also set to host this year's
Commonwealth Games.
South Africa: South Africa may be the strongest contender of the
Tier I nations. They have great venues/location, a strong national team,
and tradition. However, they are also interested in the 2023 World Cup
(15s) so if they are forced to choose we bet they would pull out of
hosting in 2018, unless they feel they have no chance at 2023.
Wales: With the mess that the Welsh federation is in right now it
would seemingly rule them out. However, it's telling that Wales has
hosted 15s World Cup matches in the 1999, 2007, and 2015 says something
about their sway in the IRB.
Fiji: No country is identified more with 7s than Fiji. They are
pushing hard for a stop on the IRB Sevens Series and may get it but in
terms of hosting a World Cup they may have too many obstacles to be
considered a serious contender. The biggest problem is the lack of a
modern large stadium to host the event.
Singapore: Singapore are set to open a brand new stadium. They
are also known to be aggressive bidders. All of that goes in the favor.
That said, they are being proposed to host matches for the 2019 World
Cup and hosting the tournament in Singapore doesn't really take the game
to a new market.
Hong Kong: The city-state holds the same problem as Singapore in
terms of the 2019 World Cup. Plus, they have hosted the 7s RWC two of
the six times it's been held. It would hardly be breaking new ground.
UAE (Dubai): The biggest hit against Dubai is that the World Cup
is pretty much set for the summertime meaning that it is too hot to play
safely there. Also, it hosted the tournament in 2009. Still, it has
some impressive facilities and players love playing there.
Netherlands: Selecting the Netherlands would definitely break new
ground for the IRB and it would be a central location for fans around
Europe. Stadiums aren't an issue either. However, their men's 7s team
hasn't done much in the way of strong play and they aren't the most well
resourced union meaning they may struggle to put on the event.
Portugal: Portugal offers a lot of the same positives as the
Netherlands in terms of location and stadiums. However, they haven't
hosted a large tournament before and the union hasn't shown it's
capable.
Spain: See Portugal.
So where does the U.S. stack up in this group? On the surface there is a
lot to like about the U.S. bid that has to put it near the top of the
list. It has a number of stadiums with secondary fields that would be
perfect for the event. The Las Vegas 7s is growing in popularity and
with rugby's inclusion in the Olympics the sport is getting more
attention. U.S.A. rugby (bear in mind they don't run the Las Vegas 7s)
has shown they can run a successful tournament when they hosted the
Junior World Rugby Trophy in 2012. They've also been on a string of
successful matches involving Tier I nations. The enormous television
audience in the U.S. is also attractive.
Still, it's not a guarantee that the U.S. will host. Other countries
have tough bids and offer a lot of the same positives as the United
States. But none of those countries would be breaking new ground. All
the Tier I nations have hosted some large tournament in the past and
placing the 2018 World Cup in those countries would essentially be
preaching to the choir. Placing it in the U.S. would offer the chance to
possible expand the game to new fans. U.S.A. Rugby has to prove that
they won't have an empty stadium like what we saw in Moscow.
In the end it all comes down to politics. Tier I nations have more votes
in the IRB than Tier II or Tier III nations and often they only look
out for each other. As we've seen with past IRB events, or even FIFA
events, the best bid doesn't always win.